Crafting the Campus Experience

โ† Back to Projects

Lyceum Campus
Web Redesign

Reimagining a University's Digital Front Door

Lyceum Campus โ€” University Website Web UI Redesign cover
Role
UI/UX Designer
UX Researcher
Timeline
6 Weeks
2024
Tools
Figma
Adobe Illustrator
Platform
Web
Responsive
Published
Behance

A university's website is often the first handshake with a prospective student. Lyceum Campus's existing site was fumbling that handshake โ€” burying course information under layers of nested menus, breaking on mobile devices, and looking like it hadn't seen a design update in years. This project stripped everything back to one question: what does a student actually need to find, and how fast can they find it?

01 โ€”โ€” The Problem

Context & The Problem

Three audiences, one website, zero clarity. Prospective students couldn't find course fees. Current students couldn't locate exam schedules. Faculty had no streamlined portal. The existing site had grown organically over years โ€” page after page bolted on without a coherent navigation strategy โ€” until the whole structure became an archaeological dig rather than a digital experience.

"Students were spending an average of 4โ€“7 minutes just to find basic course information โ€” something that should take under 30 seconds."

๐ŸŽฏ

Problem Statement

Inconsistent navigation, cluttered layouts, and broken information hierarchy left every user group โ€” students, parents, and faculty โ€” confused and unable to locate critical academic resources.

๐Ÿ

The Goal

Redesign the entire web presence to cut navigation friction, achieve accessibility compliance across all age groups, and strengthen brand identity โ€” targeting a 60% reduction in time-to-information.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ

Target Audience

Current students (18โ€“26), prospective applicants & parents (16โ€“50), and faculty/admin staff โ€” each with vastly different digital literacy levels and usage patterns.

02 โ€”โ€” Discovery & Research

Discovery & Research

Before touching a single pixel, the project demanded deep listening. Competitive benchmarking against five local and international university sites, informal interviews with enrolled students, and direct observation sessions revealed patterns that no amount of guesswork could surface.

Competitive Analysis

โœ• Where Competitors Failed
  • Dense, table-heavy layouts that overwhelm first-time visitors
  • No clear visual hierarchy between primary and secondary content
  • Mobile experiences that feel like desktop pages shrunk to fit
โœ“ Opportunities Spotted
  • Card-based layouts with clear CTA hierarchy perform significantly better
  • Progressive disclosure โ€” surface essentials first, reveal details on demand
  • Dedicated "Quick Access" zones for the most-searched content

User Personas

๐ŸŽ“
Kavya Perera
Primary โ€” Prospective Student ยท Age 18
Mobile-first Impatient Visual Learner

"I just want to know what courses you have, how much they cost, and when intake starts."

๐Ÿ’ผ
Mr. Silva
Secondary โ€” Parent / Sponsor ยท Age 48
Desktop user Detail-oriented Seeks Trust

"Is this a recognized degree? I need to read the full curriculum and see the faculty credentials."

๐Ÿซ
Dr. Fernando
Tertiary โ€” Faculty / Admin ยท Age 55
Quick-access Internal Portals Routine

"I use the site purely to jump into the LMS or find academic calendar updates."

Cross-Persona Insights

Primary Goal
Core Frustration
Design Insight
๐ŸŽ“ Kavya (Student)
Finding out if Lyceum has the exact degree she wants, and how to apply.
Cluttered mobile experience. Takes 5+ clicks to find fees.
Needs a "Quick Search" and massive, thumb-friendly CTAs.
๐Ÿ’ผ Mr. Silva (Parent)
Validating the investment. Wants to read detailed syllabi and accreditations.
Trust markers are missing. Text is too small to read on the old site.
Needs structured typography, high contrast, and full-page tables.
๐Ÿซ Dr. Fernando (Faculty)
Navigating to internal staff portals (LMS, Webmail) as quickly as possible.
Staff links are buried inside the generic footer menu.
Needs a dedicated sticky top-bar with ultra-quick links for internal systems.
03 โ€”โ€” Structure & Flow

Ideation & Structure

User Flow: Prospective Student Journey

๐Ÿ 
Home
๐Ÿ“š
Browse Courses
๐Ÿ”
Course Detail
๐Ÿ“‹
Admissions Info
โœ‰๏ธ
Contact / Apply
๐Ÿ’ก

The old site forced users through 5โ€“7 clicks to reach admissions contact. The redesigned flow cuts that to 3 clicks โ€” with persistent "Apply Now" CTAs visible at every stage of the journey.

Information Architecture

๐Ÿ›๏ธ

About

History ยท Mission ยท Leadership ยท Campus Life

๐Ÿ“š

Academics

Programs ยท Courses ยท Faculties ยท Calendar

๐Ÿ“

Admissions

Apply ยท Fees ยท Requirements ยท Deadlines

๐ŸŒ

Campus Life

Events ยท Clubs ยท Facilities ยท Gallery

04 โ€”โ€” The Solution

Visual Design & Style Guide

The visual identity was redesigned from the ground up to achieve a balance between academic tradition and modern accessibility. The following guidelines defined the cohesive look and feel across all digital touchpoints.

Poppins
58pt 32pt 20pt 18pt 16pt 15pt 14pt 13pt 11pt
Light Regular Medium Semi Bold Bold
#000000
#285BA2
#E5EBF3
#FFFFFF

High-Fidelity Project Deliverables

The following interface designs represent the core of the redesign, focusing on a balance of information density and visual clarity. Click any screen to explore it in high resolution.

05 โ€”โ€” The Vibe

Interaction Design & Emotional Intent

A university website should evoke the feeling of arriving on campus for the first time โ€” a blend of excitement, quiet confidence, and the sense that this is somewhere worth being. Every hover state, every page transition, every colour choice was deliberately tuned to reinforce that emotional resonance.

โœจ

Button Feel

Primary CTAs use a spring-bounce scale on hover, creating a subtle "press" sensation that signals interactivity without distraction. The emotional intent: confidence and responsiveness.

๐ŸŒŠ

Page Transitions

Content enters through staggered fade-up animations, creating a sense of the page breathing to life โ€” evoking the experience of walking into a building and having it reveal itself naturally.

๐ŸŽจ

Colour Psychology

Navy + Blue communicates trust and authority. Cyan accents inject energy and modernity. Together, they avoid the sterile white-and-grey trap of most institutional sites.

06 โ€”โ€” Results & Reflection

Results & Reflection

Outcome Metrics

0
Average path to admissions info (down from 7)
0
Task completion rate in usability testing

"Users described the redesigned experience as 'clean,' 'professional,' and โ€” most importantly โ€” 'easy to use.' Multiple test participants wished their own university's website worked this well."

๐ŸŽ“ Lessons Learned

Testing with real users โ€” not just design peers โ€” proved essential. Even "obvious" label choices like "Programmes" vs "Courses" caused significant confusion. A single wording change measurably improved findability.

โญ๏ธ What Could Be Different

With more time, quantitative A/B testing between card-grid and list formats for the courses page would strengthen the data. A proper design-token system from the start would make responsive breakpoints more systematic.

๐Ÿš€ Next Steps

Explore AI-driven personalisation โ€” surfacing relevant programs based on browsing patterns. A dedicated mobile app with offline content support would better serve students accessing study materials on the go.

๐Ÿ’ฌ Conclusion

This project proved that thoughtful UX isn't about adding features โ€” it's about removing friction. A university's website should be a welcoming guide, not a bureaucratic maze. The data validated the approach.